IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Jay520 said: The shirts/pants are supposed to represent a person's experience/genetics in this analogy. You said you can hate a person's experience/genetics, so you can also hate the shirts/pants. the combination of the shirts & pants is supposed to create the shirt-pants outfit. Much like the combination of experiences & genetics creates a person. |
The shirt (I'm removing the pants for simplicity) is the individual, while the colour is its actions. If I don't like red shirts, I do so because of the colour. If someone gives the shirt a different colour I wouldn't mind it anymore. The colour is what matters while the shirt will always be a shirt which is why there is never a reason to hate the actual fabrics.
|
Exactly. The fabric is nothing on it's own. The fabric is not independent of the color. The fabric is one with the color. You cannot feel a way towards the color without feeling the same towards the fabric. Because without the color, the fabric is nothing.