IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Jay520 said:
| IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
There are methods to keep criminals away from victims. But if the treatment is perfectly successful you would reach a point where he actually says sorry to her.
I'm not sure what that last sentence is about.
|
I'll repeat myself then. The man is more wrong then the woman because...
1.) The woman was killing the direct source of her suffering. There was no other way she could have realistically escaped with him being alive &
2.) The man killed an innocent. The woman was not making him suffer, it was his fucked up childhood. His 'revenge' was not replied to the rightful party. If he really couldn't live without her, then he had the option to get help. The woman had no options.
So yeah, we should sympathize more with the woman. |
I didn't state anywhere that the man killed someone. As far as we know he may be strictly against killing.
As for number 1, she obviously needs treatment too. In a perfect world he would end up saying sorry toher and she would accept it. In the same world murder would neverbe justified except for when necessary. That was not the case in my OP, and simply hurting him enough to not be able to follow her would be enough. |
I think I'm going to back off for a second & let you respond to Jereel Huneter's first post in this thread because it covered my points & a lot more.
