IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Jay520 said:
| IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Just remember that while the woman killed him to take revenge and to clear her mind, capturing her was his revenge for his miserable childhood (well, and to clear his mind).
Both of them did something wrong because of previous experiences. Her experience just happened to be more recent and more visible to the public.
|
Don't leave out that the woman killed the direct cause of her problems, whom would have probably captured her again when given the chance. As opposed to the man who killed an innocent, not because of her actions, but a party completely unrelated to her. |
There are methods to keep criminals away from victims. But if the treatment is perfectly successful you would reach a point where he actually says sorry to her.
I'm not sure what that last sentence is about. |
I'll repeat myself then. The man is more wrong then the woman because...
1.) The woman was killing the direct source of her suffering. There was no other way she could have realistically escaped with him being alive &
2.) The man killed an innocent. The woman was not making him suffer, it was his fucked up childhood. His 'revenge' was not replied to the rightful party. If he really couldn't live without her, then he had the option to get help. The woman had no options.
So yeah, we should sympathize more with the woman.
