The article is misinformed. The RT tab will have an unspecified Nvidia Tegra processor, more than likely a Tegra 3; and the Pro model is an i5, not a Atom processor.
Anyway, the article has a valid point overall imo. I'll repeat myself, If M$ follows through with competitive pricing for the RT, then Surface RT will likely be successful, and Windows RT in general. However, I don't see the Surface Pro being successful because it will cost as much as a Ultrabook. Would someone really pick this over an Ultrabook? The capabilities are not necessarily the same; any Ultrabook will have a faster, more powerful processor with larger storage, for likely the same price.
Also, Windows on a tab are not new (Window Slates)
Finally, people need to chill. Analyze what the article has to say, don't jump to quick conclusions because it's something you don't want to hear.
e=mc^2
Gaming on: PS4 Pro, Switch, SNES Mini, Wii U, PC (i5-7400, GTX 1060)
