So why no action in Syria?

[Millenium]

Kasz216 said:

Millenium said:
Because it's none of their business.

My honest opinion, don't really care if someone dislikes me for it.

How was Libya their buisness?

I'm not argueign they SHOULD invade.  I'm argueing that the conditions are the same as Libya.  When NATO argued we had to go for Morale reasons.

As Obama put it.... "The US can't afford to let such immoral slaughter happened, I won't ever allow it."

It wasn't, difference is that Libya != Syria, Libya was under attack from several fronts and really could only defend against the terrorists (Rebels), whilst Syria is still in a decent position to cause American "casualties" if they decide to interfere.

I won't comment on Obama calling it "Immoral slaughter" because he's not in a position to talk about morals IMO.