pezus said:
Right. How would that be a good analogy again? Are you suggesting the quality difference is as big as the difference between a lousy saab and an aston martin? |
nope what i mean is i'd rather pay for a better quality of service than getting something similar for free but of lower quality.... i'm talking about multiplayer experience.... let's put it that way i'd rather eat at longhorn and pay than get a free mcdouble.... better analogy??
and i had friend bring his one time... the network stability is nowhere close to xbl....
but hey you know if i had a ps3 i would still get xbl gold and psn+.... and i'm not rolling on cash but i'm not strapped that much that 10 bucks a month is an issue..... then again i do not get cable or sat tv (no interest or time to see commercials) and my console is a way to save money to.... cause every night i watch movies or play games it's not a night i end up with a 100 dollars bar tab.... so yeah paying a little to save more over all will never be an issue for me...
for a younger lad really tight on cash and has to chose yeah probably psn.... but for anybody that likes gaming and has the funds i don't see why there is a debate get the service on all your console don't even think about it...









