By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide on 12 June 2012
Edit Thread
Zim said:
oniyide said:
Zim said:
oniyide said:

just because you dont have a score or grade in your head, doesnt mean others dont. What is the alternative? You want that man to spend his money on something he might hate?? WHy?? All that does is encourage more bad to mediocore games being developed.


No what happens is you get people skipping good games because those games don't line up with what reviewers expect. Does it have hype, the best graphics, the most content etc.

Nier only ended up with 69%? Oh well it must be worthless. Dragon's Dogma below 80%? Oh well it clearly isn't an AAA game like Skyrim, no point in playing it. 

I want people to be more concerned about the content of the review than the final score.


And who determines what games are good?? YOU?? Me?? Thats the whole point of reviews, you havent even played the game yet and you're saying its good. NMHs is sitting on a 83 on Meta and it is one the most boring games i have played in years. Thank god I didnt go by that or by what some were saying. But Blood Stone 007 is sitting at 65 and i think that game deserves a higher score but hey, whatcha gonna do.


Please point out where I say Lollipop chainsaw is good. 

Also you just totally proved my point that the score is worthless and it's the content of reviews that matters. 

Fair enough.

I never said you were wrong on that account, my issue was you like sounded like some other loons, that say META is bad. WHen it isnt. 9/10 times i find that those averages are in line with how the game is at least for me and some others. Of course their are exceptions which i have mentioned two already.