By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pezus said:
Millenium said:
pezus said:
Millenium said:
Hope this doesn't mean they're going to release the most expensive device whilst realising last whilst "having no gamez" during the first 1-2 years, cause guess what, it's debatable whether it actually turned out "better", and secondly: You can't afford it.

End of post.

It is clear that MS rushing the 360 out is part of their RROD problems. Probably could have avoided that with a bit more time in the oven. So in terms of hardware, at least early on, PS3 was better (but also far more expensive :-p).



Not going to pussy foot about it, the RROD issues should not have occured and was bullshit, but in the long run though I don't really think the PS3 turned out significantly "better" or more important than the 360 was in this gen, let's be fair, we're not going to remember it as the console that had all the games like the PS2, nor was it the media hub like the 360 (Not that the 360 is going to be remembered for that ;)) (Before the 360, they're pretty much on par now).

I am going to remember it as the media hub. I don't look at a console that lacks basic things like Blu-Ray as a media hub >_>



Considering you're pretty big on PC it honestly suprises me that Blu-Ray on PS3 is big enough for you that it is why you're going to remember it as a media hub when we're well into the next-gen... I haven't bought a BD since 2009... Just my 2 cents though.