endimion said:
which is 2 different thing.... failing to move fast enough and have a huge r&d are 2 unrelated things unfortunatelly.... but even talking about apple.... MS has a think tank that makes cupernito looks like kindergarten yard... http://research.microsoft.com/apps/dp/pr/projects.aspx#p=1&ps=36&so=1&sb=&fr=&to=&fd=&td=&rt=!47194!47195&f=a&a=&pn=&pa=&pd= that's just one of their website not even starting with all the MS subsidiary and sister/daughter companies.... so yeah far from gaming only.... but still not many company beside energy sector or automobile sector or aerospace have r&d's that can match the size and capacity of MS they have like 20 times the employee nintendo has... it's not like it is a pissing contest..... it's just a technical fact.... sony could maybe but since they have way more than softare and computing to r&d and have a lot more employees than the 2 other because they do need huge production lines.... anyway i was merely countering all the flame bait... some nintendo fans where trying to do willingly or not.... there is simply no way that nintendo can technically have a better and/or bigger r&D than ms or sony..... now smarter managers maybe but that has nothing to do with r&D |
So it's not a pissing contest, but microsoft has better r&d because it's bigger?? sounds like a pissing contest to me....only problem is microsoft is incontinent







