By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IIIIITHE1IIIII on 02 June 2012
Edit Thread

man-bear-pig said:
@The 1,

Oh, look. Where did the first point go?


2.) I said PERCIEVED. It didnt nessessarliy have better specs, but in the eye of the general public it did.

You are still avoiding my point. People may have bought the PS3 for it's blue ray or its games, but not for its graphics (at least not significantly).

3.) Completely irrelevant, you missed the point entirely...

Not at all. You have just found an unoriginal way of avoiding my point. What people see is what matters (and people don't see specs unless they're mind blowing or horribly poor...)

4.) The new IE is fantastic, you're thinking of IE 6 or something.

That was an obvious joke. I used it so that I wouldn't have to point out how ridiculous your "PS3 haz internet which boosted lotz of sales"-point is. (look how that backlashed)

5.) No, I didnt say that,...however, it did contribute to their billions of dollars of losses.

"The main selling point of the PS4 was that you didn't have to pay for online gaming like you did with the 360. Next gen though, I suspect that Sony will introduce an online fee, as they cannot repeat the same mistakes they did with the PS3 "

Yes, you did. (assuming that you actually meant PS3)


6.) I'm talking about the advantages I mentioned in the prior points.

Oh, the ones that I just demolished?

7.) Overall, last gen the playstation brand sustained huge losses, so your point is irrelevant.

No, it's not. That just proves that Sony didn't play their cards right. Now, unlike their TV division, the PS is making money.

8.) It is a FACT that they will have a tablet.... It's not a rumor that im just speculating on...

Yes, but is it a fact that they won't take a single step beyond that?

 

...