Jay520 on 31 May 2012
pezus said:
PS3 |
hmmm... A compelling argument indeed, but Sales2099brings up a good point. What is your response????
@ Sales2099
I have a reccomendation that I think will make this comparison more valid and fun. Instead of scoring games by groups, you should it do it based on each title's score. What I mean by this. Add up the meta score of each game for a combined Super-Meta! The console with the highest super-meta at the end is the winner.
For example, Lets say console A release three games with metas of 95, 85, & 85. And Console B releases three games with metas of 95, 90, and 75. Who performed better??? Console A had one A game, and two B games. Console B had two A games and a C game. Which is superior??? At this point it'll all be subjective. An objective way to look at it would be to compare the Super Metas! Console A would have a 265. And console B would have a 260. Console A would be the objective winner!!!!!!!
This also gives more credit to a game that wouldn't have necessarily got it had it been in the same group as a lower scoring game. Example: An 89 rated game should be treated the same as an 80 rated game!!!! However, using your system they would be treated equally. Unfair! Unfair! Unfair!!!! The super Meta method is superior!!!
:O
