By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Khan said:
rocketpig said:
Mr Khan said:
rocketpig said:
bouzane said:
2. This may be true but it doesn't change the fact that the Axis was crushed almost entirely by the Soviets with comparatively little being accomplished by the British.

I find it a little difficult to swallow that the Soviets singled-handedly crushed the entirety of the Axis powers when they fought neither Italy nor Japan in force. Italy was almost a laughing stock, for sure... Japan, not so much.

Threat of the Soviet Union (despite their nonagression pact) did hurt the Japanese war effort, as they had significant resources invested in Manchuria awaiting the invasion, which could have been used to build control over the Aleutians or make the difference on Guadalcanal.

They distracted the Japanese, yes. But distraction without major conflict is not the same thing as actually defeating the enemy.

Nowhere did i suggest the Soviets were more influential in the Pacific. Just indicating that their Pacific role spanned the entirety of the war, indirectly.

Oh, I knew your point. I was simply pointed out that they didn't really fight meaningfully in the Pacific. Almost every major player had impact in every arena... Even the British had influence in the Pacific.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/