By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TWRoO said:

That does sound like a great system... I would guess most would not consider it "cost effective" enough though, it's cheaper to have each reviewer on a different game.

I guess Famitsu does have something a little like that with 4 reviewers contributing to the total score... How many different reviewers were involved in the magazine you are talking about?


I think it was somewhere between 4 and 8, but it was forever ago so I'm not entirely sure.