By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Chark said:
1. You can't just ask people around you and use that as evidence. That is not a legit means of polling. How many people? What kind of people? Is there possible bias in the survey(such as using a term like "big screen" instead of home console)? Are you only asking people you know? And for that matter, did you even ask?

Don't play stupid. You would obviously ask whether they prefer the Vita version or the PS3 version.

2. What does it matter that people play casual or hardcore titles as long as they are playing? System sellers are both hardcore and casual.

Yes, but casuals mostly go for smartphones. There could be a casual system seller but the Vita is mainly aimed at hardcore gamers.

3. My answer actally says that they can replace computers and phones. There are trade offs, but no different than using a phone as a computer. The Vita will be improving in functionality over time.

Do you see yourself replacing any of them in the future?

4. I mentioned the memory card price but I forgot to include that inflation has risen since the PSPs release. The Vita is not as expensive as everyone has been told to believe. The memory card is probably to blame for this. When the price was first announced it was received with praise. When looking at the hardware the price is also very affordable compared to other products with that capability, such as the iPad 3.

And then there's the 3DS comparison that I mentioned. $80 less purely on hardware + no need for memory cards makes it way cheaper.