Chark said:
The interview with Kaz is exactly what I was refering to as being misinformation. Kaz said that they exoect the Vita to be profitable in the body of Vita sales after 3 years. Which means that it will reach return on investment then, it has nothing to do with individual hardware sales. Return on investment is where R&D costs are applied, please do not attempt to misconstrue them with the additional costs on top of the $160. |
The $160 is for the wifi model, $90 would have to pay for assembly, the frame, manufacturing of parts (I guess this could include assemply and frame), the retailers cut, the shipping costs and the packaging. $90 does not seem like enough to pay for this. If Nintendo is selling at a loss with $70, as you said, then I'd imagine the Vita will be selling at a loss as well with $90 set aside for everything. And the $160 component list could be bogus for all we know, it wasn't official. I did find a different list showing more parts, I think it was official but it didn't have prices, I'll try to dig it up somehow. So maybe the 3G version is making money on each unit sold, but I doubt the wifi model is.
Sorry for the misunderstanding about R&D costs, but I did seperate those costs from the cost of single units. And it still counts, it'll be a while until PS vita makes up for those costs, it's still part of the price.








