superchunk said:
logic56 said:
superchunk said:
logic56 said:
superchunk said:
logic56 said:
oh how quickly we forget, when the vita'a spec sheet was leaked it was thought to be no less than 400 dollars not including memory cards
|
Vita is $400. Its selling for a loss.
|
no and no
the shit you guys make yourselves believe, unbelievably pathetic
|
lol really... you think Vita is selling for a profit? Let me guess, its because of the cost of materials report from not too long ago huh?
|
that and this http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4510591
*rolls eyes* and before you start posting that which hurts my brian so very very much to which I show you otherwise then insult you which only leads to banning and or moderation
nice and slow and with big letters
IT. IS. NOT. SELLING. FOR. A. MASSIVE. PROFIT. IT. IS. MORE. LIKELY. SELLING. FOR. A. VERY. SMALL. PROFIT. OR. AT. WORST. BREAKING. EVEN.
estimation that you actually understand - slim to non, but here's for hoping *crosses fingers*
|
hhahaa.... ohh..
That was saying the GAMING DIVISION was making money and was relating to everything current and going forward... not the Vita hardware specifically. Basically it proves nothing.
However, I was being a bit extreme and it probably is not losing $100 on each device. But its not profitable on hardware alone either. Maybe when they included the raping of buying forced memory and a couple of games, but hardware alone is a loss.
|
I'm with Superchunk here that the Vita is mos def losing money on each hardware sold. I remembe a few analyst talking about this earlier along with Sony's admission that they don't expect Vita to be profitable until after 3 years. http://www.gamesradar.com/analyst-vita-will-sell-well-and-cost-sony-65-per-unit/ One has to consider also Sony's track record which had never launched a hardware at profit; instead hoping to make up the loss with income from games and accesories.
