By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Runa216 said:
adriane23 said:

You're not even trying to comprehend what I'm saying. The game is sloppy plain and simple. No amount of fetch quests or caves is going to make me overlook that. And since we're talking about bugs, that little burnt patch on your delectable meal is actually a roach. Are you still gonna finish the meal?

You're also getting off topic on an already off topic subject. My original point was that reviewers aren't consistent in their reviews. Skyrim was just an example.

I didn't fail to comprehend you, I understood you just fine, the problem is that you're wrong.  The game is not sloppy, the movement, combat, mechanics, and menu interface are all fine.  Hell, I have the PS3 version, and it's well known that the PS3 version is the glitchiest, and I didn't find it that bad. 

Reviews for games are more consistent than movies, TV, music, or novels, you're just whining because we don't cater to YOUR tastes and opinions. 

Skyrim has quest glitches, graphical glitches, and even game breaking glitches. Movement is slow as molasses on a cold day and often looks silly because of how often you clip through the terrain. I have seen this game be more glitchy than EA sports yearly titles which is quite an accomplishment in a sad and ironic way. If simplistic, slow and boring are your idea of fine then I suppose we can say fine about the combat.  Menu interface is about the only thing I'll give you and thats only because it looks good.  I think one would have a harder time arguing that Skyrim isn't the definition of sloppy.  You saying it wasn't that bad shows that it must be at least some  bad.

I would argue that game reviews are far more biased than movies, TV, music or novels.  You are doing the exact thing you accuse him of which is whining because YOUR tastes and opinions arent being catered to. That doesnt make him wrong