richardhutnik said:
Kasz216 said:
richardhutnik said:
I wonder what is considered "too political" for TED. Someone sent me this talk on the nature of evil, and systemic reasons for people doing evil. It looks at the Stanford prison study as one of them. The views express run fundamentally against what a number of people on forums like this, which is that everything is on a personal level, and there isn't systemic evil. Pretty much presents a liberal case for why there is evil, in that the system is responsible for a lot of it. Anyhow, the video is here:
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/79JTiv
The presentation shows a number of pictures from the Abu G prison in Iraq.
I believe this video wasn't pulled off the TED site, but it does get into politics. |
I don't know if i'd say the stanford prison expierment presents a liberal case for why there is evil.
If it did, liberals wouldn't be for a large overarching government in charge of most things people do.
More libretarian if anything, though again, if you read the links i provided....
it wasn't released because it was a political arguement.
It wasn't released because it was a poorly done arguement with a number of factually incorrect statements, and which blatantly attacked one political party.
They've done speeches like this before that were much better done trying to convey the same point.
I know because i've watched them before.
Dude just hired a good PR firm to make it look like the left leaning think tank like orginization was some conservative group trying to stifle them.
|
When I was saying liberal, I meant modern liberal, not classic liberal. Modern liberal orders that problems are primarily systemic and need to be dealt with government intervention. The focus is on us doing things, rehabilitation, and people as victims of circumstance. Modern conservative ends up putting a focus on consequences, personal choice and responsibility and fault finding. What comes from this is the idea that there is a social contract, of which a Libertarian would end up arguing against, and anyone who is against there being a state.
Ok, maybe the best term to describe "modern liberal" is "progressive". There is a belief in progress and collectively governing things. The belief is you make the system of coercion responsive to oversight and have people oversee it, and then the system works to make everyone into heroes, because the environment governs all this, far less than the individual. In this also is a liberal trait of defiance of the system also, in case of personal expression, as opposed to conformity to tradition. So, pretty much I would stand this piece here is an argument that liberals would use, well at least "progressives".
|
