Kasz216 said:
I think the system matters, however the systems effectiveness depends largely on the people who it targets. Socialist programs in Scandanavia when reproduced in countries like France don't work because they have different cultures. Norway accepts the "social contract" more then France. A fully capitalist system in China would likely be less then optinal due to Chinese Culture in which people are encouraged to NOT stand out. Some second generation chinese people see themselves stopped by there own due to traditional chinese norms not teaching them the people skill qualties needed to succeed and move up into higher level management. Innovation wouldn't be as strong without a way to integrate it in the whole.
It's why modern economic theory pisses me off. Even the big Macro terms aren't really absolutes, it's all based on the individual people and the cultures from which they arise. Economic theory should be very regionally specific. |
I also agree.
The culture of specific nation(s) dramatically change the landscape of how policies effect the people. Germany has one of the strongest, hardest-working cultures, that promotes significant amounts of thrift and savings. Its allowed them to survive a lot of market downturns, despite having massive government redistributions.
Comparatively, the Japanese also have a culture of thrift, but their economy has stagnated heavily. In their case, it may possibly be due to government mismanagement of stimulus funds, as they are the poster boy for massive interventions having poor successes. But even then, their culture has probably saved them from the full brunt of massive spending, like what we've seen in Spain and Greece.
Having said that, though, the maximum benefit for a populace is when you have very free markets, and a very responsible people. If you have neither, you tend to distort things in one way or another. Free markets and irresponsible people usually yield lots of greedy situations where people get screwed. If you have responsible people without free markets, you have very sub-optimal rates of growth, and that country or culture fails to benefit from their own work.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







