Kasz216 said:
Also, one of them did get closed down while Romney was at Bain. Just it was closed down by the Canadian Pension fund. All together, the documentries biggest fault is probably not understanding what it is a company like Bain capital does. They buy companies that are failing, and about to go bankrupt.... and try and turn them around. If they don't, they sell their underlying assets which often are valued higher then the price they paid for them because the people who owned them don't want to go through the bankruptcy process. To blame Bain Capital for people losing their jobs is like blaming an ER surgeon for people dieing. Those people were going out of buisness/going to lose their jobs anyway.
|
Exactly.
That is the worst part of this 'argument'. If you attack Romney because of shuttering businesses at Bain Capital, then you have no clue what venture capitalism does. Venture capitalism is a very critical aspect of acquiring capital for new and emerging projects. Its very high-risk for the company, and somewhere near 90% of seeded companies fail within a few years. Those that do succeed result in huge profits for the VC firm, such as Facebook's recent IPO.
To attack what Bain does would be like blaming a McDonalds worker for making Americans obese.
Full disclosure: I do work with Bain Capital and other VC firms pretty frequently. They're great people. To get a good idea about what VC is about, watch "Shark Tank" in the US or "Dragon's Den" in Canada. Or heck, go on Kickstarter. Its the same concept, except you don't sell a portion of the company, but a portion of the goods sold.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







