Civilization Revolution put on indefinite hold

[Gnizmo]

Smidlee said:

Gnizmo said:

.

Civ 4 was a big step in the right direction at least. I am semi-interested in renting the game just to see how RTS work on the Wii. I am going to guess it will suck due to a lack of buttons, but I might be able to work around that.

In case you didn't know Revolution is still TBS.

I wonder if they are having difficulties trying to get everything running on the Wii?

  More likely 2K told Firaxis to drop the version that is least developed which just happen to be Wii.

 Huh, you know I thought it was turn-based and then somehow got the idea it was real-time from someone. Maybe it wouldn't suck then, but I doubt they will get the control scheme right.

 

what are you talking about? :( I have been played Civ2 until Civ4 came out and then I didn't have any doubt about what to play... especially with the whole modding possibilities behind, and after finding Fall from Heaven 2 I didn't even come back to vanilla Civ4.

 Civ 2 is just so much better than 4 it is ridiculous. I do like a few of the changes in 4 but for the most part they were just undoing the horror that was Civ 3.

 

Gebx said:

I could see Civ working pretty well on consoles, it wouldn't be like RTS games (I can't stand those on consoles)

They should of released the hold Civ's on Xbox Live to make a couple bucks.

 Scrolling across the map is painful. Not having all the keyboard short cuts for all the various minor functions would ruin the game. It is annoying enough to set-up my rail road network with it just being move a space and hit a key.