Mr Puggsly said:
bannedagain said:
Mr Puggsly said:
bannedagain said:
So why would you go with romney anyway if you against spending. I understand the bad taste from obama but Romney is not the answer and nor is Ron Paul. So lesser of two evils. OBAMA
|
According to other graphs, Obama has spent more than all past US presidents combined. But I'm not smart enough to make sense of all that wackiness.
My biggest gripe with Obama is he creates hostility towards the rich. As if the rich paying more taxes is going to somehow solve Americas problems. Wasteful spending is the real issue. It would be great if Obama attacked the people that get far more out of the government than they put in. Like those who choose to live their life on government handouts. But Obama won't attack those people, because many of them are his base.
I fail to see how Obama is the lesser evil.
|
You didn't even look at the graghs long enough to even know what you are talking or looking at. the other was the defense spending, there has been many attempt to push defense cuts through congress but Republicans will not cut anything but social programs. these programs never where the problem, the tax breaks, wars, deregulation of wall st., banks where. So what now. Also obama has been going for a cut from all programs but republican won't cut defense or rich tax cuts. So what are you talking about. Do you even know any legislation that has gone or even voted on. NO YOU DON'T.
People choose to live on handouts! ya figure you would be in here soon. What a fox news quote. most people on welfare and getting your so called handouts are veterans. So good for you that you think they are chooseing to live that sh-t hole life. You think there living high on life. I fail to see why you are so uninformed. People are on it because bush destroyed our ecconomy and where forced on it. Just like how Romney came in and destroyed hard working americans life's at bain. So yea after 8 years of destroying the ecconomy it's going to take as long as to fix it as it did to break it. But you use your fox news notes and get back to us.
there are many bills there where pushed forward for a balanced approach but since fox news didn't tell you that, you don't know that. DO ANY OF YOU READ BILLS. WOW!!!!
|
Actually, I was responding to this... "So why would you go with romney anyway if you against spending." I was pointing out how Obama is a big spender.
There are a lot of other things I'd rather cut over defense.
Find a graph or something that shows most people living on handouts are veterans, because I don't buy it.
Even if we gave Obama 50 years, I doubt he would fix anything. He's a big spender and panders to his base with entitlements. I don't know if Romney will be any better. I just can't imagine he would be worse.
|
Lets not forget Republican filibusterss killing bills non stop that would have helped the ecconomy.
I think he should have got rid of the bush tax cuts, which would have allowed me to show you a better chart and that is what pisses me off about obama.
