By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SamuelRSmith said:
bannedagain said:

you raise the SS tax past 110,000$ solves social security problem. cut loop holes that exist even with bush tax cuts gone. Done. Look you don't like tax's, move to mexico and see how thats working out. It's a sh-t hole because no one pays tax's'

Why pick Mexico? Why not Switzerland or Hong Kong?

When I drive over a bridge or stop at a stop light. I know non of that was cheap and has to keep being updated, so If you selfish and don't like funding this great country then go ahead and dodge all you want. I don't mind paying my 30% at all. I mind that a guy that make's millions pay less then me. his money actually is made off of the roads and many of things his trucks drive on. Polute our air> So really it means that people don't care to live in a country that is nice. you want it smoking and bad water, no rules and where corporations get away with everything because you defunded all the regulatory system in place.

Also medicade all you have to do is get rid of medicare part D which makes it so they have to pay store shelf price and not get discounted like every other buyer does. This was a scam by bush. all these things where put into place by republicans so they can say see it doesn't work, when it worked fine before.  so really all we have to do is get rid of most of bush and the right wing policies put into place in the last 30 years. PRoblem solved.

You really have no idea how big the unfunded liabilities is. Part D is only a small part of it.------

YOU REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH REVENUE IS  NOT COMING IN DUE TO LOOP HOLES FOR CORPORATIONS AND THE UPPER 1%

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/245-trillion-us-national-debt-144-trillion-unfunded-liabilities-2015 <- total unfunded liabilities $144tn.
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2010/03/speaking_of_lia.html <- medicare part d unfunded $7tn



Yea I see where your getting your info. we have a revenue problem, I also said we can cut in some areas. Defense is  hugh part. Non of this was a problem under clinton and all the same programs where in place. So what went bad, BUSH and policies, not anything else. they deverted money out into defense and wars.

 

Defense spending to spike $2.1 trillion under Romney

So why would you go with romney anyway if you against spending. I understand the bad taste from obama but Romney is not the answer and nor is Ron Paul. So lesser of two evils. OBAMA