crissindahouse said:
kowenicki said:
|
Carl2291 said:
Apparently, Man U's starting 11 in the last 3 games cost more than Man City's.
Ive not done the maths though... But people putting City down for spending mobey are silly.
Rooney. £27m
Young £20m
Ferdinand £30m (most expensive defender in thr world at the time)
Nani £20m
Smalling £12m
Evra £6m
De Gea £17m
Carrick £18m
Valencia £16m
Thats just off the top of my head... City arent the only ones who spend Millions upon Millions.
|
add in...
Anderson £20m (!!!!??)
Jones £17m
and numerous others that have truned out to be flops (Bebe, Kleberson, Forlan and veron anyone? combined fees £50m)
and people can see that United havent brought any really decent players through youth for a very long time and they are a buying club.
|
the difference is, that city is spending more as the whole revenue is. at least in 2009 they did that. revenue was 100 million euro and they spent 120 million pound for new players. manu doesn't do that. manu has what? 400 million revenue? if the spend 200 million in a few years and city is spending 160 million with 160 million revenue in one year, it's pretty simple to understand the difference. can't be so hard to understand...
clubs should get a percentual limit of revenue for player transfers. this would make everything much better and wouldn't be such a joke like it is atm in the premier league.. yes, it is a joke if a cub is obviously spending much more as it is economical sustainable.
|
So your plan is to destroy all competitive balance and make the rich richer.
Funny... from what i've gathered from your politics otherwise you seem like you'd be more of a "Salary Cap/Revenue sharing" type person.
