| Gilgamesh said: I never knew what the hype was all about. There overpriced lower spec machines |
Wrong. They don't have the top notch specs, they never did. But they have specs that work very well as one system, software that works very well with this exact architecture, etc. That's why it's "expensive" but that is also why it is "better" in some ways (if you need a machine like this)
Apple was about performance, loading times, no need to handle your hard drives, no need to defragment, always the full power and no system crashes. You also don't need to worry about safety unless you go public with your systems and use Windows networks. That's what made Apple big back in the day and that is why it is used in media and art. It's easier to use and wasn't in your way while you produced your art with blue or black screens, sudden shutdowns or whatever.
They became big with iPod and iPhone. Well, iPod ... nothing to say about that I guess. iPhone was a hit and is still okay. But back in the day your were "special" if you had one, now you are "special" if you don't ("special" because actually you are not sepcial at all because millions of people are like you) because you have the "special" Galaxy S2.
I won't argue about smartphones (it seems that's pretty much the only thing you are on about although you are talking about tech companies ....) but you are just like Apple-only or Samsung-only users - and they are both equally bad. Never ever try to even understand how other systems work and why they are designed that way. If you decide to be against something or think you are smarter than a lot of other people, why not be glad and proud, save your precious time and keep your greatness to yourself? Seriously.
