Mr Khan said:
Jay520 said:
Mr Khan said:
It's a fairly simple narrative. Failure is defined by expectations and goals. Clearly Sony's goal with the PS3 was to repeat the PS2, and therefore, yes, it is a failure, despite being a solid offering as far as consoles go historically (and others pointed out, compares very favorable to all its 3rd-place kin).
Likewise, PSP is a failure, because it is clear Sony's goal was to replicate the PS phenomenon in the handheld space, despite its status as the best non-Nintendo handheld on record.
|
The PS3 could be argued a failure, but not because of goals & expectations imo. Using goals & expectations, one could say the Xbox 360 was also a failure. Microsoft obviously didn't want 2nd place. Or you could say the Wii was a failure because Nintendo wanted to get great 3rd party support. Marketshare & profitability are the main determinants of success imo. |
The Wii is a mixed success because of Nintendo's lack of follow-through, not because of the lack of third party support. The Xbox 360 is also only a mixed success because they became the real PS2-type successor when the PS2-paradigm became outdated. |
Forget what I said then. We obviously have very different definitions of success.
