logic56 said:
thranx said:
logic56 said:
sales2099 said:
logic56 said:
sales2099 said:
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
sales2099 said:
What most people dont realize is inflation.
The number 30 years ago was worth a lot more then it is now. |
So by what you mean is that Sony has less worth than it had in 30 years ago? Despite the same stock points?
|
Many people dont take inflation into account.
|
you guys know that's not how inflation works right?
|
I dont see the issue here.
1 dollar was worth a lot more 30 years ago then 1 dollar is worth today. So going by that simple fact Sony is worth less now then it was 30 years ago, even though the number is the same.
Unless stock prices compensate for inflation, which I am not aware of and therefore apologize if thats true.
|
re-read that and then try again
|
1 dollar was worth a lot more 30 years ago then 1 dollar is worth today. So going by that simple fact Sony is worth less now then it was 30 years ago, even though the number is the same.
makes sense to me. the value of 1 US dollar thrity years ago was more than the value of 1 US dollar now. inflation. so is there something missing? i dont see it.
|
So if Sony was worth the same 100 billion back then, they would be worth the same amount now? if these losses were posted back then, it would be the same amount now.
you guys are aware inflation effects the whole of the world and not just Sony right?
the reaching here is starting to get worrying, (it used to be funny but now it's sad)
|
perhaps you should take your own advice and read the post.
No one mentioned losses here. we were talking about the price of a stock 30 years ago vs now. if it was worth the same # of dollars now as 30 yewars ago per share it has lost value as inflaiton has made the dolloar worth less.
