Mr Khan said:
killerzX said:
Mr Khan said:
killerzX said:
so you support discrimination. i thought you were for marriage equality.
and is not you marrying your brother a homosexual marriage.
is not you marrying your mom a heterosexual marriage.
it seems you are being quite the hypocrit here. it also seems as though you realize that your very flawed premise and argument has been dismantled, as you can not even bring up a logical argument on why gay marriage should be legal while the other forms of marriage i mentioned should not be.
|
Your entire argument consists of tossing out logical fallacies. You're committing one of the major no-no's of argument, here
|
please explain.
how can you be for one and not the other.
why should gay marriage be legal while others not.
it seems none of you guys have any argument for gay marriage and against others forms.
the arguments you guys pose for gay marriage, like that guys signature could be applied to polygamy in the exact same manner. replace the word gay with the word polygamy or incest in his sig. its the same thing, but some reason i dont think he would have as many pats on the back for such a great sig he has if he did that.
with the arguments you present in support of gay marriage, you cannot by extension possibly be against polygamy, incest or what have you. you simply cant.
|
It's a derivative of the slippery slope fallacy. You take one element of the opposition argument and stretch it out to ridiculous extremes in an attempt to invalidate it. For the purposes of the gay marriage debate, the differences between a monogamous gay relationship and other non-conventional forms of love are significant enough to merit their exclusion from the terms of debate, and introducing them is an example of the slippery slope fallacy.
|
I've seen polygomy used on both sides. One, because it's "the most traditional form of marriage"; and then the argument we have here,
