By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kowenicki said:
The Fury said:
Turkish said:
City is an artificial team created with petro dollars just like Chelsea.

Chelsea has long since shown that it's not about spending money anymore and some of their most stable important players (Terry and Lampard mainly) have been there since well before they became Chelski. They were guilty of it but not on the scale of Man City.

Man City are a small Premiership Club with money. I can't think of many of their entire squad that has been at the club since before they were bought out.

 

But then who am I to say anything, due to a nice Swiss billionnaire, Southampton are the 6th richest club in the country.... that sells all their good youth players.

 


hilarious.

I love how younger people think that football started when the premier league was formed...

Younger people? Cute.

Southampton's only real trophy success was in 1976 in the FA cup, we've waited for success just like the rest of you. Man City are not a stable Premiership Club, relegated twice since it started, they weren't even a stable First Division club when it was the top flight. They weren't even in Premiership 10 years ago. They are not a Man U, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool. They are not even an Tottenham or Aston Villa. I'm glad Man City have found the success they (the fans) deserve just wish they'd earned it the hard way. Newcastle I'd say has done better then any other club this season.

I'd say the same thing about Newcastle and or Fulham if they were bought out, spend a lot of money to win the league. At least you are a Premiership club and not a Championship club like Saints. I know our limitations, we've been promoted twice in 2 years and our team needs changing to adapt to Premiership football against the likes of Chelsea and Man U.



Hmm, pie.