By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

Because she is a crack addict who will most probably bring up all of her children in misery, making them follow her footsteps. She is also very likely to give birth to physically damaged children as they are affected by the drugs that she has been taking.

As for comparison with the God example: She is not aware of her child's future, unlike God. If she knew that it would live a horrible life and die a slow and painful death, why give birth to it in the first place?


And.. she was a crack addict becuase of the consequences of the free willed descisions she has made.

A body of a woman has the ability to reproduce and carry the womb. This shoulnt be taken from her no matter the circumstances as it created by God to function just like that. Wasnt taken away from other women that has existed for tens of thousands of years as well. 

____

This mother has free will. She can choose to make an abortion or let the kid live a hard life in to the world. Why does the kid have a hard life? Its becuase of the initial circumstances.NOT MADE BY THE KID but by the mother's ill-descisions. 

THUS GOD IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. But it is us humans. 

Think about it like this. The suffering of the kid is the fallout of the mothers bad free willed descisions. 

Bolded: So, a crack addict who also drinks a lot should be allowed to raise kids? Really? I would feel very sorry for those kids then.

Underlined: God saw it happen though, and he never did anything to stop it. He let the kid grow up in terrible conditions despite knowing how the mother would choose to raise it.

God is responsible for that kid's misery, no matter how you twist it.