sensebringer said:
New Super Mario Bros. sold more than 20 millions before been bundle. Try harder.
|
Oh? Would you happen to have a source for that?
d21lewis said:
Mazty said:
Kinect sales would suggest it's a fad: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/327350/kinect-sales-pattern-unhealthy-ubisoft/
So what if the wii had a game for every genre? If they didn't sell well, which they haven't, then it's not a console focused on core gamers. If the console is aimed at making people play games, why are game sales so low for non bundled games? What's the benefit of an inaccurate, high latency controller for gaming?
|
Kinect is a peripheral. It's like a Zapper, Power Pad, Power Glove, Eye Toy, etc.
|
But if motion controls were the future then surely it's sales would be consistant?
Soriku said:
Mazty said:
What are you on about? The Wii has sold ~45% more consoles then the 360, yet the wii game sales do not reflect anything close to 45% greater sales. They are actually almost identical. Fact. Just look at the numbers...
|
OK...what point are you trying to make though? The Wii got less prominent support from third party developers, it should be expected that sales don't reach the 45% greater sales. That's not the Wii's fault. Despite this, if you look at the chart the DS has sold less SW than the Wii despite unit sales being signficantly higher so it's not like the Wii has heavily underperformed or anything.
|
My point is that the sales show the Wii is not a console for gamers, therefore the wii is a fad because it isn't made for gamers.