By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TruckOSaurus said:
RolStoppable said:
TruckOSaurus said:

In the scenario you mentionned the person with 4 votes would be lynched as soon as the last vote was cast (no matter if that vote is for that person or not). The reasonning being that all votes are cast and that that person has the most votes.

What I'm not sure about is what happens if you have a town of 10 and the vote split is 4-2-2-1. I think the person with 4 votes gets lynched right away because no matter who the last person votes for, the player with 4 votes still has the most votes.

What a stupid system. Given how many people we have who regularly don't know what the votals are, there are bound to be a lot of accidental lynches.

At least this time, we know beforehand. The first time hatmoza used this voting system, he didn't tell anyone until we had a surprise lynch on Day One.

You want fast days, use the standard majority to have an early lynch, but have deadlines where plurality decides the lynch. But what TOS says, if we know about it we can deal with it. What was even worse in that game was a different player from the one who hat deemed lynched had actually reached this type of plurality earlier in the day, making it very much a surprise. That's why I always bring it up, not just that it was a suprise system.

Oh and I love the autocorrect "typo" of lunches.

Oh oh and and thanks Rol for auto-signing me.