Max King of the Wild said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
I know, but as far as I know they don't change a single point that I have made.
If you share some of them that you think would prove me wrong, I'd gladly admit defeat in the OP.
|
Well its hard explaining through text, especially since I don't have a phd in philosophy of religion. But a theory of natural evil is if there is a god, an all good and powerful being, then this implies there is an opposite but equal force to balance it out. Another theory of natural evil is that its a product of the world that we live in. God wants us to live in a world that has gravity and weather changes and the only way to create a world such as that then things such as floods and earth quakes will happen.
|
Interesting.
But if the balancing evil makes God incapable of seeing the future (or even threatens Him the slightest), then that would suggest that He isn't almighty.
