PDF said:
Polls obviously showed majority was in support of the war. It wasnt even a 60/40 split more like a 70/30. Do you not know we are a Democracy? We are a Republic which falls under a for of democracy. I do not think you understand how are government works and why a simple majority vote is not so simple. We are a federal government. That means we have a National Government and a State Government. The National is there to keep the States in line. The State government is there to deal with your problems. You dont want somone in another state to decide what you get to do. Do you? States want to hold on to their power and sovereignty. It benefits us. It is why laws vary from state to state. People dont want New York and California to make all the decision for everyone. If we went to majority vote less people would have there say. You cant boycott elections. If you do what does it accomplish? Nothing. You cant boycott and force them to give you a better candidate when what you think a good candidate is diff than other people. You have to just choose which one you think is the best and if you really wantto make a change get invovled. |
1) Polls are taken from a small sample that may or may not be accurate. And besides, thee amount of information our government would have to tell us would change drastically; if we had control. We would want to know more about the situation before sending our troops into war. And that changes the whole outlook on what either of us is talking about. We still could have went, but WE would have decided.
2) Republic =/= Democracy. Obviously I know that and so do you.
3) Stop thinking. You make yourself look the fool. None of my points are perfectly sound and even I can see the holes in the plans. That does not mean I wish them different, nor do I "not understand" how "are" government works. Just stop it already. I mean, I must know something...
4) Then on a state to state level, keep things as they are. But on a NATIONAL level, give everyone the right to have a say. And you completely dodged my gays point. The minority can have a say, or even impact the majority with some effort. That is where the system I would hope for shines. State to state can stay the same, but when it comes to war, or national economics, let people become educated, instead of sedated. You understand what I mean? Just because of thee ability to vote on major things like that, you would find many, upon many more people interested in how our country is run. As it stands, people are losing interest and our country is definitely hurting because of it.
5) I CAN boycott elections if I want to. Hell, I already have on a few occasions. To ask for a better system is thee only responsible action we, as a country, can take. I already stated my views. You are sheep and part of a bigger problem than those officials that get elected. You feed into the problem and then look at our children; your children, and say, "well, you fix this mess we created." Eventually, someone has to committ to an action that changes this country. Right now, you are telling me to keep it exactly the same. That is not going to fix anything. It has yet to thus far. We are in serious decline right now.
6) The best candidate to represent me is ME. And the best candidate to represent you is... probably not Obama or Hilary. You get me? We should have more control. That is what I look for. There is nothing wrong with us having the say.
01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000