Mr Khan said:
Kasz216 said:
SamuelRSmith said:
The fact that Perot did so well makes it less likely that they'd include him in the debates.
/tinfoil hat off.
Ron Paul third party run? Some kind of joint ticket with Johnson? Your views? |
Not really a tinfoil hat moment. Afterall he did really well in the first debate in 1992. (kinda sucked in the rest) Then was excluded from the debates in 1996.
Usually blamed on Clinton.
He was quite the intriguing mishmash of policies.
On the one hand he wanted to balance the budget,end oursourcing and was for protectionism, for gun control, Pro Choice
On the other he wanted to expand the war on drugs, wanted a flat tax.
|
Almost sounds like my kind of guy (with certain preconditions i'll accept the flat tax) barring the protectionism thing.
Wonder why he drew more from the Right as he did?
|
He didn't. He didn't really draw the rigth *that* much more. Exit polls usually put voters as slightly more republican than Democrat, if at all. He catered to both sides of the asile, and that really freaks the D's and R's out, because it means that there can be alternatives to their reigns of terror.
