happydolphin said:
| adriane23 said:
I'm not missing the point at all. The point that people are trying to make about indie games is pointless because they're no different from any other game.
"As badly...." Up to interpretation.
"Usually" Open to exceptions with said exceptions subject to interpretation.
"Really just want to" If you have to first figure out an author's intent before giving the lable, then the label has no meaning. Who decides on the author's intent. If a rep from TreyArch said they "really wanted to" bring something unique and new to gaming, are they on their to becoming indie? Shigeru Miyamoto really wanted to bring something unique and new with Mario and Zelda, does his intent make those games indie?
|
Like I said, there are exceptions to the rules and alot of my opinion (and that of some others here it seems) are based off of generalizations. Of course the exceptions you bring up are valid, but it doesn't discredit the truth in our generalizations.
You keep bringing up the exceptions and mentioning there is legroom for alternatives, but nobody here ever disagreed with that.
All we're trying to say is, in the big picture, EA seems out of place doing this.
Nothing complicated.
|
I already came up with my conclusion man. It's over.
