UltimateUnknown said:
pezus said:
VGKing said:
pezus said:
VGKing said:
pezus said:
But they already have the gameplay down, why can't they at least try to improve the graphics some? When you make a billion bucks of each game and put so little effort into it you know there's something wrong.
|
Uh...the gameplay keeps improving with each game. It's not just copy and paste.
Like I said before, 7 YEAR OLD CONSOLES. Gameplay and Features > Graphics
Just look at Bf3 and how many modes it has. Compare that to Modern Warfare 3....
|
I am comparing BF3 to MW3 and what I see is gameplay I find far superior in BF3. Maybe not on consoles but the PC experience of BF3 vs. MW3 is just a whole another level. Don't take this as an insult, this is just how I personally feel after playing both.
|
I feel the complete opposite.
:/
I do like nice graphics but for multiplayer games I always prefer gameplay.
|
|
Pezus, you mentioned a while before that you enjoy the campaign (story mode) of FPS. I think you may just want to have an open mind and listen to this BO2 interview where the developer talks about how exactly the new non-linear and sandbox gameplay will come into effect in BO2:
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/debut-interview-call-of/729750
I personally don't really care much for campaign in most military FPS, but this really could turn into something very interesting. A lot of people complain (which I can agree on) that COD was the game that started the whole 5-6 hour linear and scripted campaign, but COD might be what changes that, maybe too early to decide. Let me know what you think, if you do decide to take a look that is :)
|
Interest is officially piqued. Each year, the Call of Duty series does something which ends ups getting me to buy it. This is looking like it has a metacampaign on top, lending to replayability in it.
