Jumpin said:
You are also taking examples of poor countries, that is like saying "if you like capitalism so much, why not move to a country where Laissez Faire capitalism reigns like Sierra Leone." Communism has only arrived in poor countries, and the truth is that those countries generally became better off economically under communism. Look at Russia for example, it emerged from the icy diseased dirt as a world super-power. It is only in such countries that communism arises, because it is only in such countries where people become desparate enough to rebel. |
Thing is, Lassiez-Faire capitalism doesn't regin in most of these horrific, back-water countries. If you look at virtually every economic index of freedom for countries, none of these supposed paragons of economic freedom (which are dirt poor) are ever ranked.
For example:
Heritage Index:
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
- Australia
- New Zealand
- Switzerland
- Canada
- Chile
- Mauritius
- Ireland
- US
...#152 Sierra Leone
CATO EFW / Frazier Institute:
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
- New Zealand
- Switzerland
- Australia
- Canada
- Chile
- United Kingdom
- Mauritius
- United States
...#126 - Sierra Leone
I can keep pulling up data, but as you can see - countries viewed as economically free by multiple data points (e.g. rule of law, lack of governmental corruption, cost of doing business, ect) generally correlates to the bigger and more successful economies.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







