By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theARTIST0017 said:
Viper1 said:
theARTIST0017 said:

Last time I checked the TV was still the main screen for the game. So knowing this It actually wouldn't be expensive. All it is, is a controller. I'm pretty sure the screen itself is not a mandatory feature and even if so 4 of them would't have to display the main game at once. They  could all be maps or something, you know little things. Nintendo is being lazy.

You ever try to wirelessly transmit 4 simultaneous near 0 latency video feeds with bi-directional input, IR emission, NFC, a touch screen and a potential 50 foot radius?   Let me know how lazy you can be to get that working.

This is 21st century where technology literraly ten folds itself every couple or so years. And like I said, if the video feeds are not at 0 latency, turn it off!

While it may be possible to do all that now, how much could it cost? And more important, would you buy a console capable of doing that for 500-600 $/€ and then buy another 3 controllers at 150-200 $/€ each one? Not many people would buy it.

The most sensible aproach is to go with 2 controllers. If you play alone you use the controller and if you play with 1 friend, both of you use controllers. 3 friends? 1 with the controller and the other 2 with wiimotes (like some demos from last year's E3), and with 4 friends you can have 2 teams each one with 1 controller and 1 wiimote.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.