IIIIITHE1IIIII on 27 April 2012
| Jumpin said: Actually, that would be basic circular logic. Both possible premises contain the assumption you are trying to prove (that repeating events on a single time line equal no free will; and that events not repeating on a multithreaded time line equals random events and therefore not free will). So it is logically fallacious. |
There are more than two possible premises?
