By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kynes on 26 April 2012
Edit Thread
Silver-Tiger said:
Kynes said:
Silver-Tiger said:
Jumpin said:
It's scientifically proven that overpopulation and industrial civilization has been the leading cause of climate change on the planet. Currently, global warming is now progressing faster than even the worst case scenario predictions from scientists. Not to mention all of the desertification that has been occurring.

This just shows how stupid many people on this website are, only 50% agreed with fact, an additional 14% thought it was probably, and 36% of you are just flat out wrong on a question whose answer should be very obvious by now.

Pretty much this. It's embarassing and disgusting that some people still hear to crtics. Coincidentally, it's mostly Christian people who think humans have the "god-given" right the destroy the environment.


Oh, come on. The climate "science"is more a religion, with Michael Mann "hide the decline" and Al Gore as prophets, than as a science. It's funny that you criticize Christians when this is like an organized religion. Don't listen to critics, you have to believe what those politicians say, it's a matter of faith.

Pure polemic, as always. How about you prove the things you say, show me where the climate science is acting like a religion. You're denouncing a science that existed for several hundred years, scientists all over the world come to the same conclusion, and the very few who disagree happen to live in...America, which is known for radical Christians influencing the science and politics.

It's not a matter of faith. I'm one of these "weird" people who know instead of believe.

 

 

It's not a science when you keep moving goalposts. The IPCC predicted 4 to 6 C more at the end of the century, but for the last 15 years this manmade global warming hasn't happened at all. It's not a science when you have to change global warming to climate change because people begin to see that it isn't happening. It's not a science when you have to hide the Medieval warm period and the little ice age to create your hockey stick graph. It's not a science when you only use the ground stations that provide you most warming, but you discard the ground stations that provide you cooling. It's not a science when you can't suggest any other possible explanation, like O3 or cosmic rays and it's influence in the cloud formation. It's not a science when you say that CO2 will reduce crop fertility, but it's just the complete opposite.

 

A science has to accept all the possible hypothesis and criticisms, but anyone that has doubts of global warming is labelled a negationist and someone paid by petrol companies, or Christian fanboy, or any other stupid adjective. It's not a science when people try to destroy the messenger and not the message. It's not a science when lots of people live of the money they receive of asserting one and only one hypothesis. It's not a science when alarmists use images of refrigeration towers (which expel clouds of vaporized water) to represent CO2 pollution, when you can't see CO2 clouds because it's transparent. Something that don't accept criticism isn't a Science, and most defenders of the global warming theory don't accept any criticism.