IIIIITHE1IIIII on 26 April 2012
| Alphachris said: If you "rewind" and the robber changes his decision, you just proved that there is more than one possible solution. But if you rewind 1.000.000 times and he always robbed... that would still not be a proof that he couldn't decide differently the next try. You just showed that the chances for an other solution are very small. You just can't prove non-existence with logic. |
Bolded: But how is the will free if he keep making diffent decisions?
Underlined: Then simply rewind time several times "next time" to see if different results occur???
Italics: That's true, but you can disprove non-existent matter. I'm not saying that I have (other than in my misleading/attention-seeking thread title), but at the moment I see no valid counterarguments.
