theprof00 said:
Let me guess. You watch fox news....or wait, wait.. you read drudge report. Oh yes, how could I have been so blind to the one or two sources that are telling the complete truth, right under my very nose!?? And no, we wouldn't have to kill billions of people. There is already work in action to change what's going on. This involves solar power, wind energy, tidal energy (guess who's also against these alternative energies), and lots of other changes. Each change is a slice of the pie, a pie that solves the problem. However, people who are against global warming conspiracies are also against every one of these solutions. |
i watch and read all news sources, that includes fox from time to time, i try to get my news from every where and see how networks and sites are reporting suff.
my turn.. let me guess you get your news from msnbc... or wait, wait... John Stewart.
as for the bolded... the democrats. yes the dems, its usually always them that, are stiking down proposals to have green energy. cant have swinds farms miles off the coast... might abscure peoples views. cant have solar fields in the middle of the desert.
furthermore if you believe those are the solutions, you are sorely naive and mistaken, those arent at all practical or effiecient. they are an incredible waste of time and energy. Something that is clean that should be used, that greenies hate for some reason in Nuclear power. we should be investing in this, but again regulations keep us from doing so.







