Gnizmo on 27 January 2008
That`s like ps2 selling for 149$.
What? I can't make sense of this statement. Are you saying that the PS3 will be selling at the same rates of the PS2 when it hits $300?
There is no value in that comparison, you fail.
Why isn't there value in comparing it in every market and looking at that as a whole? You can't just throw around the word fail and expect to get anywhere. Your comparison is flawed because it does not account for the staggered PS2 launch where as mine does. What failing does my comparison have?
And if we took Japan market, x360 is just DEAD there. What is your point?
That is my point. You can't look at one market and draw a comparison. I am glad you understand now why you can't compare the PS3 to the PS1 with the data we have available.
PS3 can allow to lose exclusives, IT has over 40! 40! 40! 40! 40! in 2008.
You know what, I want to see a list of them. I bet the vast majority of them are garbage. Come on lets see the list already of games that have a solid release date for 2008 (which cuts out both FFXIII games). Oh and if you pad the list with PSN games then I can give you a list of Wii and 360 exclusives that will blow your mind.
Again, how much will be Ratchet PS3 sold with 43 mln. PS3 on the market. Say NUMBER.
Hum. Let me look at the current data and I will think about giving you a number. That is supposing you actually stick to the talking points rather than dodging everything I say that contradicts your statements.
