By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
chocoloco on 25 April 2012
Edit Thread
Akvod said:
chocoloco said:
Low time to kill of Call of Duty by far. Halo took me early on for online multiplayer in Halo 2, but after playing COD I have never liked long time to kill nearly as much.

I think it is more realistic forces you to be less reckless and watch your and partners back more well also being more realistic to real combat. Still I love variety and think Uncharted 3 does it right as well as Halo, but I never liked Battlefield at all as a military shooter.


Realism doesn't mean good though. And Call of Duty and "realistic" just don't go together. Pulling out a knife from your body and throwing it? It's a Michael Bay movie on crack.

As for watching your partner's back, in reality this doesn't work out well. You'll just instakill both you and your partner who are clustered together. In fact, grouping together was less effective in BF3 than Bad Company because of the low TTK. Your partner has very little time to respond, and it's more about who gets the first jump than your HP level.

If it was a high TTK, you and the first guy will first shoot. Let's just assume you come out with 50% HP. Then the partner and you get in a fire fight, and you end up dying. In a high TTK situation, you can't just run and gun against a group of enemies. You either have to get a good position on them, and/or aim reallly well for the head. In a low TTK game, you can just spray the body and wipe out everyone.

Fair enough concerning realism as no game can do it all right, they are games after all. But I can gurantee if in real war you come under fire from enemy forces from behind and no one is there to defend the squad will be eliminated. In Battlefield this surely creates a little more team work because you can more easily defend. I am just saying it creates more of a thrill to me knowing if you are not constantly alert that you will be knocked out of the match.

The knife thing is probably just so people do not get involved in long hand-to hand combat because otherwise it would be easy for players to get free kills from a distance.

Now do not take my response as an all out attack on battlefield as I only played the last two betas and did not like them. I could if I gave the time as I love online shooters. My main reason I like quick to kill is I play 80% deathmatch/free for all because it is just that much more intense to me. Battlefield does not even have this while Halo , uncharted 3 and many others do.

Overall, I would say there are more long time to kill shooters than stort time: Killzone, resistance, uncharted, battlefield, Halo, MAG, just to name a few. In fact, I think there are a lot less short to kill shooters, but COD remains the most popular so it could appear there are more multiplayer shooters like it.