LCD LED vs Plasma for gaming ???

[fordy]

Netyaroze said:

fordy said:

craighopkins said:
yes they are.. but if they used High tech plasma tech they would have to pay for patents too... and small sizes would eat into profits

Eizo are not a company highly interested in releasing products that they believe are less quality but cheaper. They like to maintain their status as a company with superior colour representation for computer graphics design.

Have you read what I wrote ? Plasma is not qualified for replacing LCD Monitors. Eizo makes high res Monitors thats impossible for Plasma 1080p is the max the pixel density is just superior for LCD but that doesnt matter for TVs and until a couple of years ago manufacturing smaller screens than 50 inch was hard.

 

The Colors are good for Plasma but CRTs beat both technologies in that regard.Where Plasma shine is the infinite contrast and reaction time. 

 

@Slowmo.

Ofcourse you are right that there are benefits to more expensive cable. Cross Talk shouldnt happen even for the cheaper cables and if the signal doesnt come through or just partially it means the cable is broken. But the quality itself cant possibly get better there is nothing to improve.

I'm not sure if it's an actual physical impossibility or there has not been enough investment towards lowering the pixel density of plasma screens, but I'd be interested to know what professional monitor companies' standpoint is on it.

I've never heard of an infinite reaction time at all. Not even light has such a thing. However, you might be interested to know that some higher-end Eizo monitors are reported to have a higher colour fidelity than CRTs.