| fordy said: To all of those saying that Plasma has the better picture quality with colours etc, can anyone explain, if that is the case, why professional computer monitor manufacturers such as Eizo don't use the Plasma technology in their monitors? |
1) Size... there are no PLASMA display less than 42".
2) Static image... PLASMA is not good or not flexive for static image when compared to LCD... static images is like Windows, Linux, etc.
3) Pixel density... it's impossible to make PLASMA with ultra-high resolutions... the biggest PLASMA resolution (2K and 4K) have 150".







