theprof00 on 24 April 2012
| thranx said: my only concern is that if you use it as a pc moniter the resolution isn't very high. I thought of using my 32 in tv as a replacement moniter, and its just ugly for pc games. I went back to my 12 inch pc moniter beause it has a higher resolution and when you sit close you really notice. Unless it goes above 1080 p for computers. Other than that it sounds like a good deal. |
1080 p is not good for pcs?
Isn't that 1900x1080? Sounds pretty high to me.
I can't remember now what my pc resolution is.
Found this:
| Acronym | Aspect ratio | Width (px) | Height (px) | % of Steam users | % of web users |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVGA | 4:3 | 800 | 600 | n/a | 1.16 |
| WSVGA | 17:10 | 1024 | 600 | n/a | 2.29 |
| XGA | 4:3 | 1024 | 768 | 4.66 | 20.71 |
| XGA+ | 4:3 | 1152 | 864 | 0.97 | 1.66 |
| WXGA | 16:9 | 1280 | 720 | 0.68 | 1.54 |
| WXGA | 5:3 | 1280 | 768 | 0.62 | 1.61 |
| WXGA | 16:10 | 1280 | 800 | 4.48 | 13.57 |
| SXGA– (UVGA) | 4:3 | 1280 | 960 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
| SXGA | 5:4 | 1280 | 1024 | 10.39 | 7.81 |
| HD | ~16:9 | 1360 | 768 | 1.34 | 2.20 |
| HD | ~16:9 | 1366 | 768 | 6.24 | 17.57 |
| WXGA+ | 16:10 | 1440 | 900 | 8.74 | 6.73 |
| HD+ | 16:9 | 1600 | 900 | 4.52 | 3.55 |
| UXGA | 4:3 | 1600 | 1200 | 0.95 | n/a |
| WSXGA+ | 16:10 | 1680 | 1050 | 17.37 | 3.72 |
| FHD | 16:9 | 1920 | 1080 | 25.15 | 4.50 |
| WUXGA | 16:10 | 1920 | 1200 | 7.75 | 1.07 |
| WQHD | 16:9 | 2560 | 1440 | 0.93 | 0.32 |
| QFHD | 16:9 | 3840 | 2160 | n/a | n/a |
| 3:4 | 768 | 1024 | n/a | 1.44 | |
| 16:9 | 1093 | 614 | n/a | 0.62 | |
| ~16:9 | 1311 | 737 | n/a | 0.32 | |
| Other | 4.39 | 6.84 |
So about 93% of steam users have display settings of 1080p or less, with 1080p being 25%
