Ji99saw said:
theprof00 said:
sales2099 said:
pezus said:
sales2099 said:
Its good in theory, but then we all know Television is Sonys worst division.
Its standard to offer great deals when your not doing good in the market. |
Does that have anything to do with this? Their television division has lost a lot of money, but that does not mean this particular TV is bad
|
Yes it does. When someone is in the market for a TV, you do your research. I wouldnt invest in a brand that is well known is become severely downsized. SOme people would think that equates to the tv brand being of sub par quality.
But hey, its times like this where Sony has to become a loss leader to stay alive. It is a great deal but it all depends how many gamers are gonna jump on this.
|
Ahahahaha, dude you must be a troll account I mean seriously.
They are losing money because their tvs are 300 dollars more than samsungs at the same quality
Logically, this means the tvs are of equal quality (given that they already get a lot of their screens from samsung, go figure), but are overpriced (or samsung is underpriced). This tv being nearly half the price than it was previously (500$ to 300$) means that, according to infallible logic, this is both a quality set AND affordable.
|
Or as logic dictates the T.V. is not selling well so they lower the price to get rid of stock
|
Logic clearly dictates that the model was overpriced.
