By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor said:

WTF are some of you trying to do???????

I played it for a good hour and a half. When actually playing a PS Vita GA game, the textures look noting like Uncharted 1 on PS3. Nowhere near. Its rediculous to even lay that claim. In fact I think it insults Unchated 1. Those images there are way over ressed in comparison to the actual game. By over ressed I dont neccessarily mean the whole image I mean the textures themsleves.

Then theres te poly models. The very obvious polygons sticking out on objects, backpack straps, vines, water moving nowhere near the water in Uncharted 1 on Ps3.

Its all so absurd, its not even close to a discussion.

When playing it the first thing noteable is low res textures and low polys. Great lighting. But then thats comparing it to a PS3 game. Whic Im only doing because some really silly people think it competes. If I dont compare it to 360/ps3 then it looks great for a handheld.

If comparing then not even close.

The fact its being suggested after pysically seeing these differences is just beyond crazy.

 

Truth is Uncharted 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UCGA>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3DS>>>>>>>>>>>>DS>>>N64

Disagree. Just started up Golden Abyss now to double check. The textures in those screenshots aren't representative (you're right) but the real ones are still far from low-res. To say it's "nowhere near" the quality we see in Drakes fortune is insane. The water also looks gorgeous, waterfalls look especially good and the level on the river is a good showcase. Poly counts aren't as high as what's seen on PS3, but it's certainly not a huge difference. And along with the better lighting, the colours are super vibrant because of the OLED screen.

There's a reason why the majority of people who've played it describe it as on-par or very close to Drake's fortune. You're the first person I've heard describe it as otherwise. That's not to say that you're wrong because the majority disagree with you, but you calling people silly for thinking it competes with Drakes fortune is clearly unreasonable.